All the most prominent Darwinists proclaim naturalistic philosophy when they think it safe to do so.

Most importantly, I agree that the truth of these matters should be determined by interpretation of scientific evidence - experiments, fossil studies and the like.

Evolutionary naturalism takes the inherent limitations of science and turns them into a devastating philosophical weapon: because science is our only real way of knowing anything, what science cannot know cannot be real.

In short, it is not that evolutionary naturalists have been less brazen than the scientific creationists in holding science hostage, but rather that they have been infinitely more effective in getting away with it.

The problem with allowing God a role in the history of life is not that science would cease, but rather that scientists would have to acknowledge the existence of something important which is outside the boundaries of natural science.

All the most prominent Darwinists proclaim naturalistic philosophy when they think it safe to do so.

A crush is just as simple as admiration. You get attracted to another person and time can allow feelings to grow more into something more than that.