No doubt it is true that science cannot study God, but it hardly follows that God had to keep a safe distance from everything that scientists want to study.

In China we can criticize Darwin but not the government. In America you can criticize the government but not Darwin.

Science...has become identified with a philosophy known as materialism or scientific naturalism. This philosophy insists that nature is all there is, or at least the only thing about which we can have any knowledge. It follows that nature had to do its own creating, and that the means of creation must have included any role for God.

So one reason the science educators panic at the first sign of public rebellion is that they fear exposure of the implicit religious content in what they are teaching.

The monopoly of science in the realm of knowledge explains why evolutionary biologists do not find it meaningful to address the question whether the Darwinian theory is true.

Darwinism is not merely a support for naturalistic philosophy: it is a product of naturalistic philosophy.

A crush is just as simple as admiration. You get attracted to another person and time can allow feelings to grow more into something more than that.