The right to enjoy property without unlawful deprivation, no less that the right to speak out or the right to travel is, in truth, a "personal" right.

The right to defy an unconstitutional statute is basic in our scheme. Even when an ordinance requires a permit to make a speech, to deliver a sermon, to picket, to parade, or to assemble, it need not be honored when it's invalid on its face.

The Court today holds the Congress may say that some of the poor are too poor even to go bankrupt. I cannot agree.

The 4th Amendment and the personal rights it secures have a long history. At the very core stands the right of a man to retreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion.

I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material but I know it when I see it.

The dichotomy between personal liberties and property rights is a false one. Property does not have rights. People have rights.

For me this is not something that can be swept under the rug and forgotten in the interest of forced Sunday togetherness.