I think it's a conundrum. If we have no laws on this, people take it to one extension further, does it have to be humans, you know?

Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be 'constitutional' does not make it so.

I think a lot of things could be handled locally.

I'm in favor of everything with regards to ending institutional racism.

The Democrats promised equalizing outcomes through unlimited federal assistance while Republicans offered something that seemed less tangible - the promise of equalizing opportunity through free markets.

I have allowed the president to pick his political appointees…But I will not sit quietly and let him shred the Constitution.

The problem is that in our country, they make it almost impossible for politicians to win anything. In England it's easier to win a libel suit.