This much I can say with definiteness - namely, that there is no scientific basis for the denial of religion - nor is there in my judgment any excuse for a conflict between science and religion, for their fields are entirely different. Men who know very little of science and men who know very little of religion do indeed get to quarreling, and the onlookers imagine that there is a conflict between science and religion, whereas the conflict is only between two different species of ignorance.

There is no likelihood that man can ever tap the power of the atom

Religion and science, then, in my analysis are the two great sister forces which have pulled, and are still pulling, mankind onward and upward.

I conceive the essential task of religion to be "to develop the consciences, the ideals, and the aspirations of mankind".

I consider an intimate knowledge of the Bible an indispensable quality of a well educated man.

Two erroneous impressions ... seem to be current among certain groups of uninformed persons. The first is that religion today stands for mediaeval theology; the second that science is materialistic and irreligious.

Perhaps the Mad Hatter had a reason for calling time Him.