The First Amendment is about how we govern ourselves - not about how we titillate ourselves sexually.

Under the First Amendment's prohibition of the establishment of religion, the Court has steadily made religion a matter for the private individual by driving it out of the public arena.

There can be no doubt that the systematic hostility of the courts to religion has lowered the prestige of religion in the public mind.

One man's larceny is another's just distribution of goods.

The judge's authority derives entirely from the fact that he is applying the law and not his personal values. That is why the American public accepts the decisions of its courts, accepts even decisions that nullify the laws a majority of the electorate or their representatives voted for.

The right to procreate is not guaranteed, explicitly or implicitly, by the Constitution

The notion that Congress can change the meaning given a constitutional provision by the Court is subversive of the function of judicial review; and it is not the less so because the Court promises to allow it only when the Constitution is moved to the left.