There is room for words on subjects other than last words.

Marxian exploitation is the exploitation of people's lack of understanding of economics.

I think philosophers can do things akin to theoretical scientists, in that, having read about empirical data, they too can think of what hypotheses and theories might account for that data. So there's a continuity between philosophy and science in that way.

The trouble with government regulation of the market is that it prohibits capitalistic acts between consenting adults.

The terminology of philosophical art is coercive: arguments are powerful and best when they are knockdown, arguments force you to a conclusion, if you believe the premisses you have to or must believe the conclusion, some arguments do not carry much punch, and so forth. A philosophical argument is an attempt to get someone to believe something, whether he wants to beleive it or not. A successful philosophical argument, a strong argument, forces someone to a belief.

Taxation of earnings from labor is on a par with forced labor.

What else can matter to us, other than how our lives feel from the inside?