I think if the content is good and the content is interesting, the at home viewer will watch it for as long as the story is interesting thus the responsibility for making the story interesting falls on the shoulders of the reporter or the producer. Then I'm disappointed that producers have felt that television can only be told in 59 second story bursts because we've become, it's become journalism based on MTV, video electronic editing and cutting.

Travel is very subjective. What one person loves, another loathes.

I'm convinced that if the same opportunities were made available to everybody, people would want to better their lot in life.

Nobody would watch Lifestyles of the Poor and the Unknown.

I think that the spirit of America is still very much one of where people want to work hard and the majority of people want to work hard. They want to be entrepreneurs. But when you have that all taken away with government regulation or with government overbearance of taxation, you start to wonder whether if it's even worthwhile because who are you really working for? Are you working for yourself, are you working for the government? In the end, this wealth distribution scheme that's at the heart of the current political administration is an inherently wrong one.

The system is wrong where it rewards the lack of interest in work with money, so you don't have to work.

I'm disappointed in television. I'm disappointed first of all in the audience that will not let stories be told in longer form.