But I think it is a serious issue to wonder about the other platonic absolutes of say beauty and morality.

With thought comprising a non-computational element, computers can never do what we human beings can.

My own way of thinking is to ponder long and I hope deeply on problems and for a long time which I keep away for years and years and I never really let them go.

But I think it is a serious issue to wonder about the other platonic absolutes of say beauty and morality.

It is always the case, with mathematics, that a little direct experience of thinking over things on your own can provide a much deeper understanding than merely reading about them.

We have a closed circle of consistency here: the laws of physics produce complex systems, and these complex systems lead to consciousness, which then produces mathematics, which can then encode in a succinct and inspiring way the very underlying laws of physics that gave rise to it.

I would say the universe has a purpose. It's not there just somehow by chance.