If people won't spend any money, the government has this moral obligation to do it.

Why is it is claimed that if people won't or can't take care of their own needs, that people in government can do it for them?

When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence, accept that the state owns our bodies.

The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.

I'm always looking for an opportunity to bring progressive Democrats together with some conservative libertarian types, because there are places where we can agree.

There should essentially be no limits to the voluntary definition of marriage.

Today’s events are reminiscent of the Old Testament story of how the Israelites demanded a king over God’s objection. They believed that a king would give them peace and security. The results proved otherwise.