We must continually remind ourselves that there is a difference between what is natural and what is actually good for us.

If one doesn't value logic, what logical argument would you invoke to prove they should value logic?

Life is a continuous flux. Our nonhuman ancestors bred, generation after generation, and incrementally begat what we now deem to be the species homo sapiens - ourselves. There is nothing about our ancestral line or about our current biology that dictates how we will evolve in the future. Nothing in the natural order demands that our descendants resemble us in any particular way. Very likely, they will not resemble us. We will almost certainly transform ourselves, likely beyond recognition, in the generations to come.

Jesus Christ—who, as it turns out, was born of a virgin, cheated death, and rose bodily into the heavens—can now be eaten in the form of a cracker

The difference between science and religion is the difference between a willingness to dispassionately consider new evidence and new arguments , and a passionate unwillingness to do so.

All civilized nations must unite in condemnation of a theology that now threatens to destabilize much of the earth.

We rely on faith only in the context of claims for which there is no sufficient sensory or logical evidence.