I suspect that over time we will rely increasingly, or take notice at least increasingly, on international and foreign courts in examining domestic issues. [Doing so] may not only enrich our own country's decisions, I think it may create that all important good impression.

I don't know that there are any short cuts to doing a good job.

I didn't want to be out of order answering any questions.

The freedom to criticize judges and other public officials is necessary to a vibrant democracy.

I sort of thought the framers of the Constitution were talking about the rights of individuals, not corporate entities.

If a State refused to let religious groups use facilities open to others, then it would demonstrate not neutrality but hostility toward religion.

Unfortunately civility is hard to codify or legislate, but you know it when you see it. It's possible to disagree without being disagreeable.