The truly free market is the worker's best friend.

The alternative to the market process is government control, and we know where that principle leads.

The more power government has to provide things, the more power it has to dictate terms.

It should go without saying that even the most narrowly construed eminent-domain power would violate individual rights. Either a person owns his legitimately acquired property or he does not.

Today, the people who would use guns to violate rights have little trouble getting them, while those who would use them to defend their rights have increasing trouble getting them. ... Gun control is in effect a subsidy for criminals.

Government spending reduces the capital that could be invested to serve consumers and to produce new employment opportunities.

In an unmolested market economy - one where all dealings are consensual - the 'allocation' of wealth and income is the result of transactions.