Thus we can see that – at least at the level of economics – democracy is a sort of slow-motion suicide, in which you are told that it is the highest civic virtue to approve of those who want to rob you.

The entire Nazi war machine was only possible because of past, present and future violations of the non aggression principle (achievable only through government).

There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership into the hands of a small, political elite and their minions.

The least Anararchic person in that conversation is the person saying 'you can't be an anarchist if you believe in god.' Because that's not an argument, it's just a statement. Why would somebody accept that? Because they either bow to your authority or they are afraid of your aggression. That's threatening to be another kind of ruler. Does that make any sense?

The best way to look at countries on a map is like a chalk outline drawn by the police when someone dies what you are seeing with the borders are just outlines of historical crimes past warlords empires its nothing to be loyal to. Have loyalty to reason, to evidence, to ideals not to lines drawn up mostly by criminals.

The war on drugs is really the war on people who buy drugs from people who don't lobby the government.

Government is a gun that shoots money at your enemy and blows up in your face.