Most bad books get that way because their authors are engaged in trying to justify themselves. If a vain author is an alcoholic, then the most sympathetically portrayed character in his book will be an alcoholic. This sort of thing is very boring for outsiders.

As a rule, the most dangerous ideas are not the ones that divide people but those on which they agree.

The only virtue a character needs to possess between hardcovers, even if he bears a real person's name, is vitality: if he comes to life in our imaginations, he passes the test.

Powerful men in particular suffer from the delusion that human beings have no memories. I would go so far as to say that the distinguishing trait of powerful men is the psychotic certainty that people forget acts of infamy as easily as their parents birth

Whenever you hear the word "inevitable", watch out! An enemy of humanity has identified himself.

Consistency is a virtue for trains: what we want from a philosopher is insights, whether he comes by them consistently or not.

We now have a whole culture based on the assumption that people know nothing and so anything can be said to them.