What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?

Science is about the process; it's not about the conclusion.

Anecdotes generate questions, not answers.

There is no skepticism without science and the scientific method. It's about how we know what we know.

Questioning our own motives, and our own process, is critical to a skeptical and scientific outlook. We must realize that the default mode of human psychology is to grab onto comforting beliefs for purely emotional reasons, and then justify those beliefs to ourselves with post-hoc rationalizations.

Some claims deserve ridicule, and anything less falsely elevates them.

History is strewn with ideas that were intuitive and made sense at the time, but were also hopelessly wrong.