Feminists who want to censor what they regard as harmful pornography have essentially the same motivation as other would-be censors: They want to use the power of the state to accomplish what they have been unable to achieve in the marketplace of ideas and images. The impulse to censor places no faith in the possibilities of democratic persuasion.

I have received many touching letters and emails from people who live in the most religious parts of the country, in places like rural Texas, saying it is so good to see someone be able to say I am an atheist without shame.

One of the interesting things is is that Judaism was very attractive to the Roman aristocracy.

The biggest religious wars and persecutions in history occur when religions, each claiming their own absolute truths, come into conflict.

I feel culturally Jewish because of the way that I have lived my adult life.

I have always regarded the development of the individual as the only legitimate goal of education.

There could be no more powerful argument against mixing religion and government than the success of independent African American churches in placing racial segregation and discrimination on a reluctant nation's social agenda. Would black churches have been able to take the lead in the struggle had they been dependent on funds doled out for 'faith-based initiatives' . . . ?