In sha Allah, God willing, must be the expression of humility of the active actors and it must never be the justification of the passive observers

You cannot limit the debate to being solely in favour or against. It should be more complex. When you condemn, you need to understand what led to it. In general, if it is our responsibility to condemn terrorist actions after they had happened, we have an even greater responsibility beforehand to make sure they won't happen.

Islamism implies some sort of political and social plan for Muslim people. In that classification, we find different categories. Legalist ones, traditional ones and revolutionary ones. Some of them are revolutionary but are non-violent, others are extremely violent. There are also the ones we call the literalists, like the Egyptian party Hizb al-Nour that used to be against democracy and now is getting into the political game.

Our emotions are often beautiful, but they can also be dangerous. They represent our spontaneity, and seem to speak to us of our freedom.

You can't say 'I don't do politics,' because silence is a political statement.

There is dignity in your being even if there's indignity in what you're doing.

Violence against embassies and civilians must be categorically condemned. At the same time, we must attempt to understand why such events occur.