Environmentalism has become a special interest, incapable of addressing large, complex, and global problems such as global warming.

In the months after George W. Bush's reelection, a lot of liberals and environmentalists were ready to take a hard look at their political agenda, the Democratic Party, and the interest groups they supported.

Skepticism about the potential to achieve the kinds of breakthroughs we need has been a self-fulfilling prophecy.

As social values shifted through the '80s and '90s, as modern conservatism rose to power, and as the electorate became a good deal more skeptical of both government and environmentalists, these strategies, and the institutions that were created to prosecute them, foundered.

It is worth noting that virtually every alternative energy source we have - solar, wind, nuclear, and battery and fuel cell technologies for storage - resulted from public innovation and R&D, not private. The problem is that we haven't done enough of it, and we have done it inconsistently.

Environmentalism has become a special interest, incapable of addressing large, complex, and global problems such as global warming.

We don't make the investments we need to make, the sector fails to innovate, and then we conclude that it can't innovate.