I am a big advocate of what is known as net neutrality. This means that providers are compelled to transmit content without political or commercial pre-selection.

I stand for a strong state that safeguards freedom. I don't need to show muscle for that.

Security matters should not be entrusted to people who make decisions without weighing things up.

I am a politician, but I am also a Christian.

From my perspective, the state has to assume responsibility for the integrity of international communications.

Service disruptions have to be avoided or at least resolved as quickly as possible. When the Internet goes down, consumers don't notice the difference between a technical malfunction, an act of sabotage by hackers or a military attack.

I see no constitutional problems with the identification, staving off and defusing of outside threats.