Although the prime numbers are rigidly determined, they somehow feel like experimental data.

Moreover, if one selects a problem, works on it in isolation for a few years and finally solves it, there is a danger, unless the problem is very famous, that it will no longer be regarded as all that significant.

It is obvious that mathematics needs both sorts of mathematicians, theory-builders and problem-solvers.

What a mathematical proof actually does is show that certain conclusions, such as the irrationality of , follow from certain premises, such as the principle of mathematical induction. The validity of these premises is an entirely independent matter which can safely be left to philosophers.

This attitude [the abstract method in mathematics] can be encapsulated in the following slogan: a mathematical object is what it does.

Here is something Category-Theorists like: it is trivial, but not trivially trivial.

... the atlas is a manifold. This is a typical mathematician's use of the word "is", and should not be confused with the normal use.