People in different cultures think very differently about abortion. Abortion is not seen as a moral problem for example in Sweden or Russia, but it is seen as a difficult moral problem in China and in the USA.

It is obvious, I think, that national democracy withers. This has to do with globalisation.

How could it be that I had a legal obligation to kill people I did not know, and who did certainly not consent to it, while my father's doctor could not help my father to die when my farther asked for it? My consternation brought me to moral philosophy and a life-long search for an answer to the question when and why we should, and when we shouldn't, kill.

The kind of values for which I was supposed to kill, such as democracy and national independence, were better served, I thought, through non-violent action.

You should not take the content of your intuitive response as evidence until you have submitted your psychological reaction to what I call cognitive psychotherapy. You should do what you can to learn as much as possible about the origin of your reaction.

There are some particular moral truths that I believe we have access to (such as the one not to inflict pain on a sentient being for no reason).

Are there any good arguments in defence of moral nihilism? I think not.