Actually, I defend the right to free abortion.

It is obvious that humanity faces existential threats of a global nature. They are global in the sense that is not possible to deal with them unless we resort to global governance.

The best explanation why people agree is that they have converged on true answers.

The kind of values for which I was supposed to kill, such as democracy and national independence, were better served, I thought, through non-violent action.

It is of note that even if utilitarianism has proved to be superior to deontology and the libertarian moral rights theory in the area of killing, we are not allowed to say that it has been finally vindicated; it has to face other challenges in other areas, in particular in situations of distributive justice.

I was conscripted to military service, and my gut feeling was to refuse to serve. I did not want to kill other people. This seemed to me wrong, if not in principle, so at least in practice.

Utilitarianism condones killing of innocent human beings, even murder, if it makes the world a better place.