While people are free to draw different conclusions from the facts, there should be no debate over whether the American public is entitled to have all of the facts.

You know, in the oath that brand-new citizens take, it contains six different references to 'the law.' If it's good enough for us to ask brand-new citizens to affirm their devotion to the law, is it too much to ask that the president do the same?

It always matters, whether or not you can trust your government.

The same Constitution that allows her the right, if she wants to, to sit there and say nothing, allows these groups the right to petition their government for redress.

I don't like bonuses for public services employees who do great jobs, like prosecutors or judges.

There's no way we can get to the bottom of Benghazi without David Petraeus.

If a president can change some laws, can he change ALL laws? Can he change election laws? Can he change discrimination laws? Are there any laws, under your theory, that he actually HAS to enforce?