While people are free to draw different conclusions from the facts, there should be no debate over whether the American public is entitled to have all of the facts.

When you go into public service, you understand you're trading something. You want to feel good about what you do, but you're not going to make what people in private sector make.

I don't like bonuses for public services employees who do great jobs, like prosecutors or judges.

Members of Congress are incredibly blessed and fortune to have the jobs that we have. Nobody makes us run. Every two years we offer for public office, and if you don't want to do it then don't run. But the notion that you can make $174,000 in this country and be underpaid is laughable.

While people are free to draw different conclusions from the facts, there should be no debate over whether the American public is entitled to have all of the facts.

I don't have an issue with whether - from a legal standpoint, with whether or not government can impose the ultimate punishment on people. We do it in capital cases. Police officers shoot fleeing felons.

What do we do with a president who can basically change what Congress passed by attaching a letter saying I don't agree with this part or that part?