The desire for a nonviolent and cooperative world is the healthiest of all psychological manifestations. This is the overarching principle of liberation and revolution. Undoubtedly, it seems the highest order of contradiction that, in order to achieve nonviolence, we must first break with it in overcoming its root causes. Therein lies our only hope.

I'm too sexy for my shirt, too sexy for my shirt, too sexy it hurts.

A random group of homeless people under a bridge would be far more intellectually sound and principled than anything I've encountered at the university so far.

Tailoring the facts to fit one's theory constitutes neither good science nor good journalism. Rather, it is intellectually dishonest and, when published for consumption by a mass audience, adds up to propaganda.

There's always merit to having a debate.

Could it be that toxic mimics are toxic because they ignore responsibility, they ignore relationship, they ignore presence, they substitute control for fluidity and choice?

And why, by the way, did it take Arabs to do what people here should have done a long time ago?