To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.

There can be no doubt that the practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer has become part of the fabric of our society.

The president's need for complete candor and objectivity from advisers calls for great deference from the courts.

There can be no assumption that today's majority is "right" and the Amish or others like them are "wrong." A way of life that is odd or even erratic but interferes with no right or interests of others is not to be condemned because it is different.

To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.

We are more casual about qualifying the people we allow to act as advocates in the courtroom than we are about licensing electricians.

It is indeed an odd business that it has taken this Court nearly two centuries to discover a constitutional mandate to have counsel at a preliminary hearing.