So-called 'undesirables' are not the problem. It is the measures taken to combat them that is the problem.

People do not always argue because they misunderstand one another, they argue because they hold different goals.

People very rarely think in groups; they talk together, they exchange information, they adjudicate, they make compromises. But they do not think; they do not create.

What attracts people most, it would appear, is other people.

If you want to seed a place with activity, the first thing to do is to put out food.

Nonconformity is an empty goal, and rebellion against prevailing opinion merely because it is prevailing should no more be praised than acquiescence to it. Indeed, it is often a mask for cowardice, and few are more pathetic than those who flaunt outer differences to expiate their inner surrender.

The onlooker had better wipe the sympathy off his face. What he has seen is a revolution, not the home of little cogs and drones. What he has seen is the dormitory of the next managerial class.