If a man go into the London Docks sober without means of getting drunk, and comes out of one of the cellars very drunk wherein are a million gallons of wine, I think that would be reasonable evidence that he had stolen some of the wine in that cellar, though you could not prove that any wine was stolen, or any wine was missed.

Everybody is presumed to know the law except His Majesty's judges, who have a Court of Appeal set over them to put them right.

An enactment for the favour and liberty of the subject ought to have a liberal construction.

Nominal damages are in effect, only a peg to hang costs on.

"As the crow flies" - a popular and picturesque expression to denote a straight line.

After a hard frost a man might wake in the morning and find he was breaking a covenant.

Fictions of law must be consistent with justice.