Pregnancy is of course confined to women, but it is in other ways significantly different from the typical covered disease or disability.

[I]f we assume a liberty interest but nevertheless say that, even assuming a liberty interest, a state can prohibit it entirely, that would be rather a conundrum.

The Constitution requires that Congress treat similarly situated persons similarly, not that it engages in gestures of superficial equality.

Perhaps you should say there should be mandatory retirement even of members of the court, members of the federal judiciary. I'm sure there can be questions about whether one does as good work when you get into your - you know, I'm 67.

The Equal Rights Amendment would "turn holy wedlock into holy deadlock."

Pregnancy is of course confined to women, but it is in other ways significantly different from the typical covered disease or disability.

It is impossible to build sound constitutional doctrine upon a mistaken understanding of Constitutional history... The establishment clause has been expressly freighted with Jefferson's misleading metaphor for nearly forty years... There is simply no historical foundation for the proposition that the framers intended to build a wall of separation... The recent court decisions are in no way based on either the language or intent of the framers.