If I understand Dirac correctly, his meaning is this: there is no God, and Dirac is his Prophet.

It isn't right. It isn't even wrong.

That's not right. That's not even wrong.

For quite a while I have set for myself the rule if a theoretician says 'universal' it just means pure nonsense.

Physics is very muddled again at the moment; it is much too hard for me anyway, and I wish I were a movie comedian or something like that and had never heard anything about physics!

The layman always means, when he says "reality" that he is speaking of something self-evidently known; whereas to me it seems the most important and exceedingly difficult task of our time is to work on the construction of a new idea of reality.

How can one avoid despondency if one thinks of the anomalous Zeeman effect?