With products the form is almost the finished piece, but with architecture it is not.

With products the form is almost the finished piece, but with architecture it is not.

I don't think that architecture is only about shelter, is only about a very simple enclosure. It should be able to excite you, to calm you, to make you think.

One has to strive for a very open liberal society.

I've always been interested in combining architecture with a social agenda, and I really think you can invest and be inventive with hospitals and housing.

There are some very similar moments in the early work where the focus was on drawing, abstraction and fragmentation. Then it moved to the development of ideas. Lately it has become what architecture should be, which is more fluid organization. There has not been so much 'a change' but 'a development'.

There are 360 degrees, so why stick to one?