It appears, then, that ethics, as a branch of knowledge, is nothing more than a department of psychologyand sociology.

It appears, then, that ethics, as a branch of knowledge, is nothing more than a department of psychologyand sociology.

I see philosophy as a fairly abstract activity, as concerned mainly with the analysis of criticism and concepts, and of course most usefully of scientific concepts.

I saw a Divine Being. I'm afraid I'm going to have to revise all my various books and opinions.

If the assertion that there is a god is nonsensical, then the atheist's assertion that there is no god is equally nonsensical, since it is only a significant proposition that can be significantly contradicted.

The traditional disputes of philosophers are, for the most part, as unwarranted as they are unfruitful.

There never comes a point where a theory can be said to be true. The most that one can claim for any theory is that it has shared the successes of all its rivals and that it has passed at least one test which they have failed.