The ground for taking ignorance to be restrictive of freedom is that it causes people to make choices which they would not have made if they had seen what the realization of their choices involved.

It appears, then, that ethics, as a branch of knowledge, is nothing more than a department of psychologyand sociology.

Theism is so confused and the sentences in which "God" appears so incoherent and so incapable of verifiability or falsifiability that to speak of belief or unbelief, faith or unfaith, is logically impossible.

But if science may be said to be blind without philosophy, it is true also that philosophy is virtually empty without science.

The ground for taking ignorance to be restrictive of freedom is that it causes people to make choices which they would not have made if they had seen what the realization of their choices involved.

It seems that I have spent my entire life trying to make life more rational and that it was all wasted effort.

We say that a sentence is factually significant to any given person, if, and only if, he knows how to verify the proposition which it purports to express.