Why must art be static? You look at an abstraction, sculptured or painted, an entirely exciting arrangement of planes, spheres, nuclei, entirely without meaning. It would be perfect but it is always still. The next step in sculpture is motion.

The universe is real, but you can't see it. You have to imagine it.

Just as one can compose colors, or forms, so one can compose motions.

My fan mail is enormous. Everyone is under six.

That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.

My whole theory about art is the disparity that exists between form, masses and movement.

The trouble with a lot of artists today is that they have too much technique and equipment. They don't know what to do with it all. If you cut down on it, you can work more strongly within narrower limits.