If words are not things, or maps are not the actual territory, then, obviously, the only possible link between the objective world and the linguistic world is found in structure, and structure alone.

As words are not the things we speak about, and structure is the only link between them, structure becomes the only content of knowledge. If we gamble on verbal structures that have no observable empirical structures, such gambling can never give us any structural information about the world. Therefore such verbal structures are structurally obsolete, and if we believe in them, they induce delusions or other semantic disturbances.

If words are not things, or maps are not the actual territory, then, obviously, the only possible link between the objective world and the linguistic world is found in structure, and structure alone.

The map is not the territory... The only usefulness of a map depends on similarity of structure between the empirical world and the map.

The present non-aristotelian system is based on fundamental negative premises; namely, the complete denial of 'identity.'

We see what we see because we miss all the finer details.

Thus, we see that one of the obvious origins of human disagreement lies in the use of noises for words.