If words are not things, or maps are not the actual territory, then, obviously, the only possible link between the objective world and the linguistic world is found in structure, and structure alone.

I want to make clear only that words are not the things spoken about, and that there is no such thing as an object in absolute isolation.

If we, who live outside asylums, act as if we lived in a fictitious world- that is to say, if we are consistent with our beliefs- we cannot adjust ourselves to actual conditions, and so fall into many avoidable semantic difficulties. But the so-called normal person practically never abides by his beliefs, and when his beliefs are building for him a fictitious world, he saves his neck by not abiding by them. A so-called "insane" person acts upon his beliefs, and so cannot adjust himself to a world which is quite different from his fancy.

I am the same kind of moron as the rest of you, it's the method that does the work, for me as well as for you.

Psycho-galvonic experiments show clearly that every emotion or thought is always connected with some electrical current.

Thus, we see that one of the obvious origins of human disagreement lies in the use of noises for words.

God may forgive your sins, but your nervous system won't.