It is amusing to discover, in the twentieth century, that the quarrels between two lovers, two mathematicians, two nations, two economic systems, usually assumed insoluble in a finite period should exhibit one mechanism, the semantic mechanism of identification - the discovery of which makes universal agreement possible, in mathematics and in life.

Identity is invariably false to facts.

I think therefore I seem to be.

I want to make clear only that words are not the things spoken about, and that there is no such thing as an object in absolute isolation.

These 'philosophers', etc., seem unaware, to give a specific example, that by teaching and preaching 'identity', which is empirically non-existent in this actual world, they are neurologically training future generations in the pathological identifications found in the 'mentally' ill or maladjusted.

Second order effects, such as belief in belief, makes fanaticism.

Riches I need not, nor man's empty praise.