Who rules our symbols, rules us.

The map is not the territory... The only usefulness of a map depends on similarity of structure between the empirical world and the map.

It seems evident that everything which exists in nature, is natural, no matter how simple or complicated a phenomenon it is; and on no occasion can the so-called 'supernatural' be anything else than a completely natural law, though it may, at the moment, be above and beyond the present understanding.

The present non-aristotelian system is based on fundamental negative premises; namely, the complete denial of 'identity.'

If words are not things, or maps are not the actual territory, then, obviously, the only possible link between the objective world and the linguistic world is found in structure, and structure alone.

The objective level is not words, and cannot be reached by words alone. We must point our finger and be silent, or we will never reach this level.

Whatever you say it is, is simply what YOU SAY it is.