We see what we see because we miss all the finer details.

Mathematics and logic have been proved to be one; a fact from which it seems to follow that mathematics may successfully deal with non-quantitative problems in a much broader sense than was suspected to be possible.

The objective level is not words, and cannot be reached by words alone. We must point our finger and be silent, or we will never reach this level.

I think therefore I seem to be.

Second order effects, such as belief in belief, makes fanaticism.

If words are not things, or maps are not the actual territory, then, obviously, the only possible link between the objective world and the linguistic world is found in structure, and structure alone.

Let us repeat the two crucial negative premises as established firmly by all human experience: (1) Words are not the things we are speaking about; and (2) There is no such thing as an object in absolute isolation.