I want to make clear only that words are not the things spoken about, and that there is no such thing as an object in absolute isolation.

The present non-aristotelian system is based on fundamental negative premises; namely, the complete denial of 'identity.'

Riches I need not, nor man's empty praise.

Thus, we see that one of the obvious origins of human disagreement lies in the use of noises for words.

Second order effects, such as belief in belief, makes fanaticism.

A person does what he does because he sees the world as he sees it.

Any object of thought is both 'more than what we think, and different'.