Any object of thought is both 'more than what we think, and different'.

Identity is invariably false to facts.

It is now no mystery that some quite influential 'philosophers' were 'mentally' ill.

I am the same kind of moron as the rest of you, it's the method that does the work, for me as well as for you.

The map is not the territory.

Different ‘philosophies’ represent nothing but methods of evaluation, which may lead to empirical mis-evaluation if science and empirical facts are disregarded.

It is amusing to discover, in the twentieth century, that the quarrels between two lovers, two mathematicians, two nations, two economic systems, usually assumed insoluble in a finite period should exhibit one mechanism, the semantic mechanism of identification - the discovery of which makes universal agreement possible, in mathematics and in life.