The objective level is not words, and cannot be reached by words alone. We must point our finger and be silent, or we will never reach this level.

Whatever you may say something is, it is not!

Thus, we see that one of the obvious origins of human disagreement lies in the use of noises for words.

If words are not things, or maps are not the actual territory, then, obviously, the only possible link between the objective world and the linguistic world is found in structure, and structure alone.

As words are not the things we speak about, and structure is the only link between them, structure becomes the only content of knowledge. If we gamble on verbal structures that have no observable empirical structures, such gambling can never give us any structural information about the world. Therefore such verbal structures are structurally obsolete, and if we believe in them, they induce delusions or other semantic disturbances.

I want to make clear only that words are not the things spoken about, and that there is no such thing as an object in absolute isolation.

Whatever you might say the object "is", well it is not.