Fichte is concerned with freedom as non-domination.

I am a one-trick pony. But I have worked hard at something I would have liked to do even if I weren't paid a penny for it, and made a good living at it. You can't be luckier than that in this life, no matter who you are or what you do.

Kant's treatments of rational theology and metaphysics were aimed primarily at theoretical questions. His attitude toward the pseudo-sciences of "special metaphysics" in Wolff and Baumgarten was always double-edged. He did see them as pseudo-sciences but also valued their doctrinal value and especially their regulative value for the empirical sciences. Like his views about religion, I don't think any of this is any longer viable in its original form.

I think the contribution people make is not proportionate to their fame or success. In fact, I think the relation is often inverse.

Kant thinks of judgment as a special faculty or talent of the mind, not reducible to discursive reasoning but cultivated through experience and practice.

We can establish empirical criteria for free actions, and investigate human actions on the presupposition we are free.

It is probably not a good idea to ask someone to expound a position they do not accept and do not feel they even fully understand.