The ideal in chess can only be a collective image, but in my opinion it is Capablanca who most closely approaches this.

Style? I have no style.

I am thinking about chess in schools in particular. In the USA more than 3200 children competed in an event.

I still love to play chess. So I do not even spend a minute on the possibility to step back.

I like 1.e4 very much, but my results are better with 1.d4.

After that, Kasparov stepped back from chess which is, and I want this to be clear, not good for chess in general at all. As a whole, the current situation in the chess world leaves a lot to be desired.

Chess is a very tough game, and psychologically a tough game. And of course chess needs a lot of qualities, human qualities. And so you must have very strong nervous system and then you must be well prepared, you must be able to work a lot.