I don't know anybody who needs a critic to find out what art is.

The (photographic) negative is the equivalent of the composers score and the print is the equivalent of the conductors performance.

All art is a vision penetrating the illusions of reality, and photography is one form of this vision and revelation.

The skies and land are so enormous, and the detail so precise and exquisite that wherever you are you are isolated in a glowing world between the macro and the micro.

All art is the expression of one and the same thing- the relation of the spirit of man to the spirit of other men and to the world.

I do not think there is any question of photography being an art form!

The photo-journalist and the photo-poet are both important. The problem is to separate the major objectives of the various groups and not to attribute qualities and intentions where they do not belong.