Having served as the majority spokesman for the House Ways and Means Committee after Republicans took the House in 1994, I've seen the promise and the peril of divided government before.

Bush to USSS: 'We need to get back to Wash. We don't need some tin horn terrorist to scare us off.'

Why then would people look to the United Nations as an instrument of peace, if instead all it is, is an instrument of putting out declarations that nobody intends to take seriously anyway?

I think the burden is on those people who think he didn't have weapons of mass destruction to tell the world where they are.

Having served as the majority spokesman for the House Ways and Means Committee after Republicans took the House in 1994, I've seen the promise and the peril of divided government before.

If Democrats were good at thinking like Republicans, they would see the light and stop being Democrats.

The president of the United States and the secretary of defense would not assert as plainly and bluntly as they have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction if it was not true, and if they did not have a solid basis for saying it.