My lawyer's opinion is that the cops might not actually be able to charge me with criminal damage any more - because theoretically my graffiti actually increases the value of property rather than decreasing it. That's his theory, but then my lawyer also believes wearing novelty cartoon ties is a good look.

Graffiti ultimately wins out over proper art because it becomes part of your city, it' s a tool; "I'll meet you in that pub, you know, the one opposite that wall with a picture of a monkey holding a chainsaw". I mean, how much more useful can a painting be than that?

Some people represent authority without ever possessing any of their own.

I don't think you should have to pay to look at graffiti. You should only pay if you want to get rid of it.

Film is incredibly democratic and accessible, it's probably the best option if you actually want to change the world, not just re-decorate it.

Nothing is black and white, and there is no purity and there is no such thing has justice.

We don’t need any more heroes; we just need someone to take out the recycling.