Science provides a much more satisfactory way to seek answers than does any religion.

The debate [in Undeniable] was nominally about creationism as a "viable" explanation for what we observe around us. For my side, the debate went very well; I'm not sure what I would change, although I can imagine shortening my answers during the rebuttals, perhaps.

One of the drawbacks of English is you can't spell things by hearing them.

Television isn't inherently good or bad. You go to a bookstore, there are how many thousands of books, but how many of those do you want? Five? Television's the same way. If you're going to show people stuff, television is the way to go. Words and pictures show things.

We need them. We need scientifically literate voters and taxpayers for the future.

Teaching creationism in science class as an alternative to evolution is inappropriate.

Evolution is a theory, and it's a theory that you can test. We've tested evolution in many ways. You can't present good evidence that says evolution is not a fact.