After all, C++ isn't a perfect match for Java's design aims either.

Clearly, I reject the view that there is one way that is right for everyone and for every problem.

The standard library saves programmers from having to reinvent the wheel.

Any verbose and tedious solution is error-prone because programmers get bored.

Some software is actually pretty good, by any standard. Think of the Mars Rovers, Google, and the Human Genome Project. Now, that's quality software!

People who passionately want to believe that the world is basically simple react to this with a fury that goes beyond what I consider appropriate for discussing a programming language.

And no, I'm not a walking C++ dictionary. I do not keep every technical detail in my head at all times. If I did that, I would be a much poorer programmer. I do keep the main points straight in my head most of the time, and I do know where to find the details when I need them.