Before the election, I reported on a story about a counterintelligence officer from another service sending reports to the FBI saying that his sources in Russia were saying that Moscow tried for years to cultivate and co-opt Donald Trump. I'm not saying that happened. I'm saying I hope the FBI took a strong look, because it is really hard to believe that a president-elect would be so callous in how he approaches this issue and so dismissive of the seriousness of it.

I do think John Kerry has tried awfully hard to work with Russia and others to have a lasting, significant cease-fire.

Rush Limbaugh is not the arbiter of what's good taste or what American opinions or morals should be.

Bush and Cheney were not misled by flawed intelligence; they used the flawed intelligence to mislead.

The question I have is out of all these commencement speeches that are happening, what`s the really worthwhile advice that a 21, 22 year old person will walk away from the speech and say, I can apply this maybe five years, 10 years later. How many speeches actually push the button like that, other than yours?

Obama has not accomplished a key mission: sell his own successes and keep his own (political) troops fired up and ready to go.

This is how proofiness works. The assertion is more important than the evidence itself.