Everything that creates itself upon the backs of smaller scales will by those same scales be consumed.

People wouldn't even go into science unless there was something much bigger to be discovered, something that is transcendent.

In our current understanding of science, we can't find the physical gap in which to slip free will - the uncaused causer - because there seems to be no part of the machinery that does not follow in a causal relationship from the other parts.

Our ignorance of the cosmos is too vast to commit to atheism, and yet we know too much to commit to a particular religion. A third position, agnosticism, is often an uninteresting stance in which a person simply questions whether his traditional religious story (say, a man with a beard on a cloud) is true or not true. But with Possibilianism I’m hoping to define a new position - one that emphasizes the exploration of new, unconsidered possibilities. Possibilianism is comfortable holding multiple ideas in mind; it is not interested in committing to any particular story.

You are more likely to believe that a statement is true if you have heard it before - whether or not it is actually true.

Evolve solutions; when you find a good one, don't stop.

Even though the outside world has not changed, your brain dynamically presents different interpretations.